| T O P I C R E V I E W |
| Kazerella |
Posted - 21/02/2009 : 16:16:33
If you were stuck in the middle of the wilderness with not much hope of survival - who would you rather be stuck with?
Ray Mears who might bore you to death- but at least you might get a good shelter and COOKED fish or badger to eat.
or
Bear Grylls who you might have to beat to death for being annoying and in the mean time would only find you raw snails, soar berries and little frogs to eat? |
| 8 L A T E S T R E P L I E S (Newest First) |
| Kazerella |
Posted - 19/05/2009 : 16:47:02
Well ...it's a good job I'm a ninja then. I don't need Bear or Ray to survive in the wilds.  |
| Kehhlyr |
Posted - 19/05/2009 : 09:44:26
haha, I Agree with Paulusworm.
It was the 'BANZAI' that cliched it I think. |
| Paulusworm |
Posted - 19/05/2009 : 08:33:01
Ray Mears would do my head in. He's so dull  .
I'll give you an example. You're faced with a ravine and there's a deep river at the bottom. Ray Mears' answer would be "let's walk along until we find a crossing point"..... BORING!!!!. Bear Grylls would say "looks to be deep enough....BANZAI!!!!!". How much more fun would that be.
You may not die of hunger with either of them but you'd die of boredom with Ray  |
| Kazerella |
Posted - 11/05/2009 : 11:15:09
That's such a good idea. I bet if you were sensible with the portions, you could make him last 3 weeks. Plenty of time to be rescued. |
| Amyboo |
Posted - 10/05/2009 : 19:28:40
yeah I agree, I would want Ray! If I was stuck with Grylls I would kill and eat him!!!!! |
| Kazerella |
Posted - 22/02/2009 : 17:36:34
But- what if he makes me eat mushrooms  |
| matty18714 |
Posted - 21/02/2009 : 17:01:21
Ray. With him you get to eat some nice fruit and smoked fish  . With Grylls its slugs and snake heads  |
| lewy |
Posted - 21/02/2009 : 16:24:50
Ray - He's got more fat on him - so I'd go with him... Bear Grylls - Can't be doing with him! |
